Source: Fidelity Tried to ‘Make an Example Out of Us’
Monday, December 21st, 2009Earlier today we passed along word that Fidelity seems to be trying to amend its public stance about why it recently fired four fantasy football league commissioners.
FSB.com believes that the switch in public language from focusing on the “gambling” connection to misuse of company time stands on footing about as firm as that of a hedge fund. It seems a lot more like reaction to the negative play that Fidelity has gotten since the story went public.
Over the weekend, FSB.com was contacted by a member of the “Fidelity Four” (or should we call them “InFidels”?) other than Cameron Pettigrew. Our source asked that his name not be used, as the quartet prefers that Pettigrew remain the public face for now, but he provided credible information that further paints Fidelity’s actions as misdirected at the gambling angle.
“I just want to clear something up, a point that is being overlooked by the media,” our source said. “Fidelity Investments blocks access to any and all websites that have anything to do with fantasy sports and gambling — not to mention blocking sites like theonion.com, nintendo.com and thousands of other non work-related websites.
“Fidelity does grant access to nfl.com, espn.com, yahoo.com, etc, but if you then try to click on one of their fantasy links, you will get a giant message on your screen letting you know that access to the fantasy section of that website has been blocked.
“So now you know that we could not have been managing our teams or leagues on company time.”
Of course, the initial Fort Worth Star-Telegram report didn’t say that the company accused any of the four employees of managing teams or leagues at work. The only specific contested action singled out was Pettigrew’s receipt of two instant messages referring to NFL players (or, at least Trent Edwards).
Various companies have rules against spending company time and resources on personal matters, but it’s hard to believe that Fidelity axes any employee who interacts via IM on subjects not related to work. If such offenders do immediately get the boot, then OK. That would seem harsh, but allowable as long as it’s a consistent policy.
Far more likely, however — based on all the available evidence in this case — is that the higher-ups at this Texas branch of Fidelity incorrectly drew a link between fantasy sports and gambling and decided to make a big point to its workforce.
“Thanks to this site and others, we now know that fantasy sports do not even fit the definition of gambling,” our anonymous source said. “We got fired for talking about it at work, and they caught Cameron via Fidelity’s internal Instant Messenger service. In mine and Cameron’s case, we had perfect records, and never received a warning about this or anything else. Just fired, as the commissioner’s of our leagues, while everyone else who was participating got to keep their jobs.
“So really, they just tried to cut the head off the snake, scare people straight, and make an example out of us.”
The source said the four fired workers have not yet decided to take legal action. From here, though, the case looks pretty strong.